Some People Call Me the Greatest Occultist of the Twenty First Century
  • Home
  • About
    • G.D.O'Bradovich III
    • Occultism Explained
    • Family
    • Family Pet
  • Attempt To Date
    • Rationale For "An Attempt to Date" Series
    • AATD a Gemini Cancer >
      • AATD an Occultist
      • AATD April Fool's Day
      • AATD August
      • AATD Babylon
      • AATD Belief
      • AATD Chivalry
      • AATD Chrism
      • AATD Christian Heresies
      • AATD Christmas
    • AATD Columbus >
      • AATD Corpus Christi
      • AATD Easter
      • AATD Faith
      • AATD German
      • AATD Gnosticism
      • AATD Greek
      • AATD Halloween
      • AATD Hemp
      • AATD Indulgences
    • AATD Islam >
      • AATD Jesus
      • AATD Jews, Hebrews and Isrealites
      • AATD Khan
      • AATD Lunacy
      • AATD Mithras
      • AATD Moscow
      • AATD Mormons
      • AATD Nepotism
      • AATD Parables
    • AATD Pharisees >
      • AATD Plato
      • AATD Prophets
      • AATD Roman Catholicism
      • AATD Royalty
      • AATD Russia
      • AATD Sadducees
      • AATD Saint Augustine
      • AATD Satan
    • AATD Sections of the Bible
    • AATD Tartars >
      • AATD Ten Church Fathers
      • AATD the Ancient Aryans
      • AATD the Ancient Church Councils
      • AATD the Antichrist
      • AATD the Apocalyptic Revelation of Jesus Christ
      • AATD the Church
      • AATD the City
      • AATD the City of Rome
      • AATD the Crucifixion
      • AATD the Crusades
    • AATD the Episcopal Succession of the Early Church >
      • AATD the Eucharist and Communion
      • AATD the Great Pyramid
      • AATD the Greek Orthodox Church
      • AATD the Holy Grail
      • AATD the Holy Roman Empire
      • AATD the Horde
      • AATD the Influence of the French language on the English language >
        • Supplement to AATD French
      • AATD the Influence of the Latin Language on the English Language
      • AATD the Julian Calendar
    • AATD the Maccabees >
      • AATD the Mediterranean
      • AATD the Merovingians
      • AATD the Metonic Cycle
      • AATD the Netherworld
      • AATD the Ordinaries Of The Western Church
      • AATD the Ottomans
      • AATD the Prodigal Son
      • AATD the Renaissance
    • AATD the Resurrection >
      • AATD the Roman and Pagan Gods
      • AATD the Roman Catholic Mass
      • AATD the Roman Empire
      • AATD the Rules for Roman Numerals
      • AATD the Scythians
      • AATD the Second Coming
      • AATD the Slavs
      • AATD the Torah, the Talmud and the Pentateuch
      • AATD the Traditions of Marriage
    • AATD the Tsar >
      • AATD the Turks
      • AATD the Word "Christian"
      • AATD the Writings of Saint Paul
      • AATD Thomas
      • AATD Witches
      • Great Martyr Saint George
  • Aphorisms
  • Apprentices
    • Candidate and Apprentice Applications
    • 14 Reasons the Supreme Court Got it Wrong on Gay Marriage: Commentary >
      • A Commentary on Adeimantus' Speech
      • An Exegesis on Corrupting the Youth
      • Baal Worship
      • "Choice, the problem is choice."
      • Conversing with Braydon
      • Creating new Gods: An Introduction
      • Denver: A Dialog
      • European Heresy Hunters of the 1930's and 1940's
      • Euthyphro or On Holiness
      • Exegesis of the song Believer
      • For Young Men Who Like To Think
    • Forgiven >
      • Gay Pride
      • Gratitude
      • Halloween-The Most Wonderful Time Of The Year
      • I am all things to all men
      • "I Know My Redeemer Liveth..."
      • ​“I Will be Like the Most High.”
      • "I'm not a Liar."
      • Isaac: PAA to Apprentice Denver
      • Lazarus
      • My First Paper
      • My Second Paper
      • Natural Law and Marriage
    • Nietzsche's Antichrist as explained through the Pauline, Evolved and Historically False Church >
      • Of Cars and Cupcakes
      • “Oh, yes. There will be waves.”
      • Ordinations of the Papacy from 1447 to 1831
      • Our Standard is Death
      • Parallels between the Occult and Philosphy
      • Piu Tempo Non Ho
      • PlatoCare-Is it affordable?
      • Potential Apprentice Brayden (Again)
      • ​Potential Assistant Joey Contra Apprentice Denver
      • Savior or Saviour
      • Skippy McDonald
      • Terrible Truths
      • The Adherence of the Esoteric Order of the Elements by Indiana State University
      • The Crisis of Modernity
      • The Difficulties of Determining the Date for Easter
    • The Evolution of Common Sense >
      • The Ignorant Orthodox Church Examined
      • The Manager by Machiavelli
      • The Modern Super Villain or The Will To Poverty
      • The Mystery of the Faith
      • The Psychology of Occultists
      • The Self and Narcissism
      • The Unknown and Unseen God
      • The Wonderful World of Occult Research
      • Usage of the definitive article in the Greek Gospels
      • Various Indications for the Commencement of the New Year
      • Vlad-the evidence for Vampirism
  • Astrology
    • A Brief Encounter with a Cancer Gemini ​
    • An Attempt to Interprete A Natal Chart
    • An Inquiry into the Suitability of Cancer/Geminis in Regardi to the Occult Arts and Sciences
    • Capricorn=Porn?
    • Hey I was wondering...
    • Rationale for the exchange of Aries for Cancer as the commencement of the Astrological Year
    • Sagittarians and their Avoidance of Organized Religion
    • The Cross Quarter of Samhain Examined
    • The Science of Astrology
    • Timing is Everything
  • Bibliography
  • Blogs
  • Christianity
    • A Gigantic Literary Fraud >
      • A Rood, a Rod, a Pole or a Cross: How the early English understood the Crucifixion
      • Against Heresies: Book 3
      • All Works and no Faith make Jack a dull Prophet.
      • Ambiguous Reading is Fundamental
      • An Attempt to Understand the Roman Catholic Doctrine of Purgatory
      • An Exegesis of Psalm 14:1
      • An Exegesis of Romans 7: 1-6-Is Saint Paul confused?
      • An Exegesis 1.The Revelation of Jesus Christ >
        • An Exegesis 2.The Revelation of Jesus Christ
        • An Exegesis 3.The Revelation of Jesus Christ
      • An Introduction to Worshipping Angels: Images and Idols
      • "An Occultist and an Orthodox Christian walk into a bar..."
      • Analyzing the Dates found in the Council of Trent
      • Commentary on Against Heresy: Book 3; Chapter 16
      • Commentary: Refutation of Heresies, Hippolytus
      • Commentary: "On The Resurrection of the Dead" (Athenagorus)
      • Commentary: "On the Resurrection" (Justin Martyr)
      • Complete Text of the Synod of Jerusalem 1672
    • Constantinople >
      • Contradictions in the Resurrection Accounts
      • Contrition
      • Credi absurdum est
      • Critics of Christianity
      • Cubit length utilized in the Ark of the Covenant
      • Edwin Johnson: Is the New Testament based on the Roman Catholic Mass?
      • "Everyone is a potential Christ"
      • Flow Chart of Catholic Theology-1515 to the present
      • Fourth Gospel Quiz
      • "Free me, Lord, from eternal death..."
    • Full Text of the Council of Trent in English >
      • Genesis And Josephus
      • Genesis Chapter 3 Explained
      • God says, the Sadducees say and Jesus says >
        • God says, the Pharisees say and Jesus said... Part 2
      • Grave Soaking
      • Hagia Sophia
      • Harmonizing the Resurrection accounts found in the Gospels
      • Homily for the Nativity: 2015
      • "I am Christ"
      • In the year 5878...
    • Intractability and the Antichrist >
      • Irrefutable Questions
      • Jesus, Son of Joseph
      • John the Baptist
      • Judgmental Christians?
      • King James Only Bible movement
      • Latin Mass
      • Luther and Trent: Together Forever
      • Maiorem hac dilectionem
    • Martin Luther and his faith in his Scripture >
      • New Units of Volume
      • Of Pawnshops, Immortal Souls and Redeemers
      • "On the Interpretation of Genesis” Leo Strauss
      • On the Soul, Tertullian, Commentary
      • Orthodox Church
      • Pope Gregory's Reform of the Julian Calendar
      • Post 420 Ramblings or "Get Saved or Die Tryin'"
      • Revival 2017
      • Roman Catholicism through the Centuries
      • Saint Mark Chapter 5: Commentary
    • Saint Paul and the Law >
      • Select Commentary on The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop
      • Simon de Montfort
      • Simon Magus
      • Simon Magus' Church: Locations and Operations Examined
      • Sin in the Fourth Gospel
      • Southern Baptists Contra Orthodoxy
      • Stauros Examined
      • Testament vs Covenant
      • The Ambiguous Saint Paul
    • The "And Ratio" in the Pauline Epistles Examined >
      • The "And Ratio" in Machiavelli's "Il Principe"
      • The Claim of Inerrant Scripture Re-Examined
      • The Complete Esoteric Saint Paul
      • The Definitive Commentary on the Incident in the Garden of Eden
      • The Failure of Modern Christianity
      • The Gravity of Sin
      • The Immortal Soul
      • The Immortal Soul: Scandal of the Millennium?
      • The Lamb of God Who Takes Away the Sin(s?) of the World
      • The Masonic Lodge
      • The New Teachings of Erasmus
    • The Origins of the New Testament Explored >
      • The Pauline Epistles Restudied and Explained, Edwin Johnson, M.A.
      • The Preexistence of the Soul
      • The Rapture of 1350
      • The Revelation of Jesus Christ in Greek
      • The St. Paul Approved Church: Where is it and What does it do?
      • The Sins of Protestantism Examined
      • The Three Claims of Christianity Examined
      • The "We Ratio" in the Pauline Espistles Examined
      • Three Commentaries on the New Testament
    • Touched By An Angel >
      • Various New Testament Words Examined
      • ​Various Thoughts on Theosis
      • Western Christianity as a Diagnosed Illness
      • What is the Roman Rite, but a denial of...
      • Where you born in a barn?
      • Why I am a Christian
      • 1204-The Sacking of Constantinople
      • 1510- Martin Luther Visits Rome
    • Credo In Unum Deum >
      • Et Resurrexit Tertia Die
      • Et Verbum Caro Factum Est
      • Confiteor Unum Baptisma...
      • Crucifixus Etiam Pro Nobis
      • Qui Propter Nos Homines...
      • Sub Pontio Pilato
  • Contact
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • Fast Food
    • Classic Fast Food
    • McDonald's-Additional Images
    • Various pictures of fast food restaurants from the 1950s and 1960s
    • 1967-Burger Chef's Innovative Broiler
    • 1990: McDonald's in Terre Haute
  • Flat Earth
    • Flat Earth Memes
    • Consider
    • Four Issues Confronting the Flat Earth Theory
    • ​Is the Earth Flat?: Select Commentary
    • ​Limiting Myself
    • On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. Copernicus
    • R.E.M. and I Feel Fine
    • The Biblical Flat Earth Examined
    • ​The Claims of Astronomy Examined
    • "The slip that brought me To my knees..."
    • Twilight: The Final Analysis
  • Goat And Crab
    • Goat and Crab Painting
  • Hardouin
    • Atheism in the Writings of the Alleged Church Fathers
    • Hardouin Vindicated Part 2: "My God, its full of coins"
    • Hardouin Vindicated
    • Origen's Commentary on the Fourth Gospel, Book 5, Examined
    • Poor Greek
    • Rest and Motion: Impiety in the writings of the Church Fathers
    • Selected Quotes from Jean Hardouin
    • The Christian Atheist: A Review
    • The New Testament Canon: The Fraud of the Alleged Writings of the Church Fathers Elaborated
    • The Prolegomena of Jean Hardouin Explored
  • Humor
    • Intelligent Design
    • 1 Corinthians 11:14
    • 2013 Begins with a Bang
  • Links
  • Music
    • A Day in the Garden >
      • A Day In The Garden: A Rationale
    • Fantasy in E Minor for Piano and Orchestra
    • Gnostic Songs
    • Joy, the Divine Spark
    • Modern Songs
    • Motivation in Titus Andronicus
    • Terre Haute Songs
    • The Magic Flute
    • The Magic Flute or Pamina
    • Titus Andronicus >
      • titus english >
        • Titus May, 2017
  • Philology
    • An Attempt To Understand Terre Haute
    • An Attempt To Understand the word Doxa
    • An Exhaustive List of Adjectives Relating to the Papacy and Roman Catholics in the English Language to the Year 1700
    • Egyptian Hieroglyphs
    • Friends and Friendship
    • International Phonetic Alphabet
    • Of Diphthongs and Dipsticks
    • The plan of Egyptian Glyphs and Phonemes
  • Philosophy
    • A Contemporary Example of Exoteric Writing >
      • A Critique of Ayn Rand
      • A Pathetic Dialogue
      • An Account Of the Whole
      • An Apology
      • An Attempt At Writing Fiction
      • An Occultist's Work Is Never Done
      • An Open Letter
      • And the Award for best...
      • Acceptance
      • Acceptance: Part the Third
      • “Always Explain”: An Esoteric Exegesis
      • Amor Fati
      • Antichrist, Full text with commentary
      • Antichrist: Terre Haute Edit
      • Apprentice Moses’ Speech: Select Commentary
      • Autumnal Equinox Musings
      • Authority Examined
      • Basic Human Care: An Introduction
      • Beaky Intercedes
      • Behold, a new cycle of Life.
      • Book of Job: Commentary:
      • Bullying or My First Memory of Being Physically Superior was when...
      • Brahe’s Ultimate Words: Select Commentary
      • Burnt Offerings
      • Claire “E.” Phi “K.” Shun
      • Cool Kids Examined
      • Concluding Thoughts
      • Confessions Concerning Corrupting the Youth
      • Crime and Intelligence Examined
      • Der Kinderfrage
      • Der Wille Zu Kampfen
      • Doctor O'Bradovich or Self Promotion Examined
      • Donnie Darko Encounters the Occult
      • Dual Minded Individuals Examined
      • End of the First Quarter: 2017
      • Esoteric Writing 2016
      • FIN
      • Final Essay
      • Foster Care or Stanger Danger
      • Freemasonry: Satanic, Pagan or...
      • Futility, Success or Failure
    • Gentle Researcher
    • "I wish I could be like the cool kids..." >
      • Global Warming Examined
      • Heterosexual Men and their uneasiness towards Gay Men explained.
      • High School 3.0
      • High Schoolers: The Penultimate and Final Chapters
      • Highland Lawn: A Dialogue
      • "How Christianity gave us gay marriage": Commentary
      • How to Commit Fraud in 11 Easy Steps
      • How to Understand this Site
      • Human, All Too Human
      • "I made a new friend." "Real or imaginary?""Imaginary"
      • "I remember when we first met..."
      • "If I ever..."
      • "I'm sorry you have failed"
      • "In conclusion to this part..."
      • In Defense of Greek Mythology
      • Is George Dead?
      • "Is There in Truth No Beauty?"
      • Journey Of The Superman
      • June 28, 2017
      • Justice Department Guidelines: Commentary
      • Lead Me from Death to Immortality
      • Letters from "Cloud Atlas"
      • Life: A Rejected Relationship
      • Maryland to the Big 10
      • May, 2017
      • Mere Humanity
      • Modernism
      • Murder: An Introduction For Individuals Without Opinions
      • "Murder, He Wrote"
      • My Condolence
      • "Natural Law and History": Commentary
      • Natural Right
      • Narvas with Translation
      • Nuremberg Trials: Select Commentary
      • On the Occasion of an Invitation
      • Persecution and the Art of Writing
      • Philosophy's Corrupting Influence
      • Price and Participation WILL vary: Thoughts on the Philosophy of Capitalism
      • Proving the Existence of God
      • Quod Scripti Scripti
      • Reincarnation through the centuries
      • Retirement
      • ROI: An Occult Perspective
    • Rose Poly >
      • Sci Fi as a Gateway to Liberalism
      • SCOTUS: June 26, 2015
      • Select Titles of works by Nietzsche that relate to Genesis Chapter 2 and 3
      • Shock
      • Sors Immanis Et Inanis
      • ​Stranger Care Examined
      • Subtle Intelligence Tests Examined
      • Symbols of Hate Examined
      • Teaching the Controversy
      • Thanksgiving 2012
      • The American Founding as the Best Regime: Commentary
      • "The Apostasy of World Vision Embracing Gay Marriage": Commentary
      • "The church needs philosophers & philosophers need the church": Commentary
      • The Cruelty of Apprentice Sarah Louise
      • The Esoteric Writing Technique of "Centering" Examined
      • The Finances of Occultists
    • The Great American University >
      • The Great Work Explored
      • ​The Issue of Psychology
      • The Light Bulb At The End Of The Universe
      • The Many Loves of Don Giovanni
      • The Masonic Third Degree: A Commentary
      • The Matrix Explored
      • The New Definition of a Mental Disorder
      • The One Percent
      • "The One whose Virtues I recognize as my Noble Virtues." ​
      • "The Politician" or "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Duplicity"
      • The Republic of Georgius Gemistus (Plethon or Pletho)
      • The Scapegoat
      • The Science of Lying
    • The Sidereal Year >
      • Symbolical Masonry: Chapter 48 Commentary
      • "The Unmitigated Disaster of Gay Marriage": Commentary
      • ​The Will To Power Examined
      • Thoughts: May 3, 2016
      • Thoughts on the Third°
      • Time Heals All
      • To Lie or Not To Lie, That Is The Question
      • Un Sub the Kitty Cat
      • Understanding Nietzsche's Writings
      • Voice over in "Cloud Atlas": A Commentary
      • While confession may be good for the soul, incarceration is not
      • Why Great Occultists are Cremated
      • Why I am a Brilliant Writer of Essays
      • "Why Mr. Anderson, why do they persist?"
    • "Write to Yourself" >
      • "Yes, Joseph, there is a Creator."
      • You may mess up...
      • ​Yours Truly Examined
  • Projects, Future
    • FBS >
      • Fifth and Sixth Stations of the Cross
      • Found August, 2017
      • Harmonizing the Resurrection Accounts 2 >
        • Harmonizing the Resurrection Accounts
      • Hate Groups Examined
      • Liberal education
      • Mass Purpose Driven Life
      • No Gays
      • Paintings
      • Terre Haute Historical Maps
      • The Impiety of The Purpose Driven Life Examined
    • Troy, Babylon, Jerusalem, and Constantinople as understood by Medieval and Renaissance Artists >
      • unorganized
      • Images to be Organized 2
      • Images to be Organized 3
      • Images to be Organized 4
      • Downloads March 2015
      • down loads aug 2015
      • Images to be Organized
      • Images August 2017
      • Pictures to be organized june 2014
      • pictures may 2016
      • sept 2017
      • 9 Gates Latin Phrases
      • 9 gates images
      • harmony of gospels 3
  • Tarot
    • Rectified Numbering of the Major Arcana
    • The Correct Attributes of the Major Arcana
    • The Pictorial Key to the Tarot, by A.E. Waite
    • 22 Select Egyptian Phonemes as the basis for the images of the Major Arcana of the Tarot


"I will be like the Most High."


Apprentice Joe

April 30, 2017

This introductory quote from the book of Isaiah, chapter fourteen, verse fourteen, is attributed to Lucifer, and if Lucifer and Satan are confounded in the public imagination, we are not surprised, as Scripture is not forthcoming with details pertaining to these intriguing entities to distinguish their spheres of influence.

In verse twelve, Lucifer is addressed as the “son of the morning” and the consensus regarding this appellation is a reference to the morning star.  Venus and Mercury can be observed for an hour before sunrise and an hour after the sunset and either planet can be considered a morning star. Before certain advances in astronomy, it was a generally held belief that the two morning stars were not identical to the evening stars, therefore, there were nine, not seven planets.

Since Lucifer is addressed as the “son”, it follows that Lucifer is masculine and as we desire to assign a specific planet to Lucifer, it must be Mercury, since astrology describes Venus as the only feminine planet and the remaining planets may not always have a helical rising or helical setting.

In verse thirteen, Lucifer or Mercury desires to rise “above the stars of God”.  The planet Mercury is near the sun, has a swift orbit, and is never far from the sun. It is reasonable to place this desire or the longing for exaltation in the person of the planet Mercury, for he is a lowly planet and wishes to rise above Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and beyond “the stars of god”, or the eighth heaven, to be “like the most high”. Of course, “most high” is an ambiguous term that may be considered as a strange expression for God.

Verse fourteen has an interesting desire: “I will ascend above the heights of the clouds”.  After declaring the intention to ascend “above the stars”, we confronted with the unexpected wording of ascending “above… the clouds”. The ancient Hebrews envisioned the throne of God behind or above the stars and, as this desire has been declared, we are uncertain why the protagonist would now want to go beyond the clouds.  We know of no ancient cosmology where the planets are inferior to the clouds, no doubt, since the planets are always superior to the clouds.  We expect the progression from clouds, to the planets, and beyond the stars. Rather the clouds seem like an afterthought, sometimes described as a “scribal error” and duly assigned as “unimportant”, that does not follow the expected sequence. In fact, the reference to clouds could be omitted, resulting in, if not a clearer, then a more reasonable, understanding.
Spinoza, Berry to his friends, clearly writes that one book of the Bible cannot be referenced in an attempt to clarify a passage in another book. Although adherents of the opinion of inerrant scripture would disagree, we offer a passage from the Revelation of Jesus Christ as evidence to support Spinoza’s claim.

“I [Jesus] … am the bright and morning star.” Revelation 22:16

Unless the Gentle Reader wishes to conflate Satan and Jesus, since both are the morning star, it is desirable to dismiss the opinion of inerrant scripture and accept both passages as examples of poetic licence, that is, the works are to be enjoyed as literature, they are not to be understood literally.

The following quotes are from the twenty eighth chapter of Ezekiel.

3 “Behold, thou art wiser than Daniel; there is no secret that they can hide from thee.”

The king of Tyre is wiser than Daniel, not as may be expected, wiser than Solomon. 

4 “With thy wisdom and with thine understanding thou hast gotten thee riches, and hast gotten gold and silver into thy treasures.”

One tangible result of the king's wisdom is wealth.

5 “By thy great wisdom and by thy traffick hast thou increased thy riches, and thine heart is lifted up because of thy riches.”

Understanding and engaging in commerce results in wealth and this, in turn, culminates in pride.

7 “I [God] will bring ... the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness.”


Wisdom is described as beautiful and as bright.  Even today, certain individuals are said to be “not too bright” or dim.

12-13 “Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.  Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God”

Interestingly, “Son of man” is an expression used by Jesus and is also found in the Acts Of the Apostles. Unlike the Greek word for man, the Hebrew word allows for multiple translations, to wit, “Son of man”, “Son of red earth”, and “Son of Adam”.

Once again wisdom is associated with beauty. Since the author does not indicate why the king was in the garden, or the significance of this statement, we cannot know either the reason or significance. We caution that any explanations or suggestions that the king of Tyrus interacted with Adam and the woman in the Garden of Pleasure is conjecture with limited evidence.

14 “Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and ... thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.”

The king is said to be a not only an angel, but a member of the highest of the nine orders of the angelic hierarchy, a cherub.  We are confused as to the manner in which a presumably purely spiritual entity has been anointed.  We are uncertain of how to understand the strange expression of “stones of fire”.  We have serious reservations when certain commentators identify these fiery stones with either the planets or the stars.  We can only speculate that the ancients reasoned that since planets and stars are “ bright” and fire is bright, then the planets and stars are fire. We are uncertain as to the the method of reasoning that would conclude that the stars and planets are stones.

15 “Thou wast perfect in thy ways ...till iniquity was found in thee.”

The epitome of stating the obvious is to write that one is perfect until one becomes imperfect, or a thing has a certain quality until it does not have this quality.  The significance of this passage eludes this commentator.

16  “I [God] will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.”

God will destroy either the king or the cherub from among the “stones of fire”.  Since the Hebrew language does not possess tenses  (past, present, or future), this section may be understood as having occurred in the past: God has destroyed. Therefore, this verse presents multiple viable interpretations.

17 “Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness”

Once again, wisdom is associated with beauty and brightness. If the passage references the cherub, then the past tense may be appropriate, however, if the king is addressed, then the present tense would be appropriate (“heart is lifted” and “thou art corrupted”). Unfortunately, the context cannot provide satisfactory hints towards one unambiguous solution.

Luke 10:18 “I [Jesus] beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”

In the form or appearance of lightning, Satan, the accuser, departs heaven. Lighting is bright and, as we have demonstrated, brightness is frequently associated with wisdom. In the introductory section of the book of Job, Satan presents himself before God on two occasions. While Satan, in the popular imagination, is opposed to God, the book of Job is clear that Satan is a faithful servant; faithful, because Satan complies with God’s commands and restrictions.  The conventional opinion is that good originates from God, while evil has its source in Satan, is, in a word, incorrect.
We are grateful that we can appeal to the authority of various passages of recognized scripture to dispel these pernicious opinions that remove evil from God's universal sovereignty and domain. Job, himself, knows that both good and evil have their origin in God. 

“But he [Job] said unto her [Job’s wife], Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?” (Job 2:10).

Job does not make the statement that both good and evil originate from God, nor is this inquiry to be answered by his wife; the question is rhetorical only. Interrogative statements cannot offer clarification, as only declaratory statements can provide clarification, and even then, not all  declaratory statements are explicit and unambiguous. 

“I am the Lord, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.” (Isaiah 45:6-7)

Scripture, in these passages, is unambiguous: the Lord creates “evil”. 

Certain commentators are willing, all too willing, to associate Ezekiel’s poetic licence of describing the king as the cherub with not only Satan, but with Lucifer and with the serpent in the Garden of Delight. Genesis relates that the cherubs with flaming swords were present in the garden to prevent Adam and the woman from eating of the tree of life. 

The liberal application of presumptions allows the covering cherub to be identified with the serpent and additional assumptions will inevitably connect the serpent with Satan.  As the Gentle Reader may surmise, this questionable type of exegesis is fraught with difficulties and concludes that the serpent is the covering cherub is Satan is Lucifer. These four distance roles are conflated into one character and we are not surprised that the conventional opinion identifies the serpent with legs as Satan.  As Saint Paul correctly noted, God is not the author of confusion, however Biblical commentators are the source of unnecessary difficulties.

As a general observation, people who claim to believe in inerrant scripture  engage in two types of questionable behavior. 

Scripture is clear that the man was deceived by a cunning serpent with legs. For those individuals who hold the opinion that man was created perfect, it is inconceivable that a lowly serpent could be so successful in convincing the man to transgress the commandment, so it is speculated that the serpent was Satan in disguise, for only the enemy of God would attempt so diabolical feat as corrupting not only man, but all of creation, and succeed. 

However, scripture explicitly states that Adam is a man and males, according to Jewish custom, become men at age thirteen.  It is not so extraordinary for us to accept that a naive teenager, where few experiences are to understood as newly created, made a poor choice; the cunning serpent with legs is sufficient to beguile Adam, no bright covering anointed cherub is necessary. 

In conclusion to this part,  if specific passages that do not conform to certain opinions, then additional passages must be referenced to justify, to varying degrees of success, these preconceived ideas.
Scripture is clear: the Lord God creates evil. Yet, because of the long held opinion that only Satan creates and engages in evil, this passage from the prophet Isaiah is either ignored by commentators or, when discussed, the art of sophistry appears. The “long held opinion” applies both to individual beliefs and centuries of teaching.  In our example from Isaiah, sophistry will successfully demonstrate, even prove,  that God does not create evil, since, as everyone knows, Satan creates evil.

We conclude that for unknown reasons, people are attracted to Scripture, not to learn, but to seek validation for their beliefs and opinions. Instead of accepting the clear meaning of scripture and acknowledging the error of their opinion, certain commentators and promoters of certain opinions “heap coals” upon their heads by appealing to other Biblical passages, thereby compounding their initial, but easily correctable, error. Saint Paul describes these individuals as always learning the opinions of others, but never coming to the truth of scripture.   We agree with Saint Paul's assessment: “The God of this world has blinded the minds of those who believe not.”

In conclusion, the inability of certain individuals to accept the clear meaning or understanding of scripture leads to their manipulation of scripture into a form that is personally acceptable and, unfortunately, the resulting pleasantness is not synonymous with eternal truthfulness. 

The Gentle Reader should seek independent confirmation of our observation that the truth is not pleasant. We offer the following evidence for his consideration:

If the truth were pleasant, then everyone would be attracted to it, go forth to it, and embrace it.

However, long and painful experience demonstrates that people seek the enjoyable, the pleasant, and the amusing, that is, opinions, and have neither need nor concern for truth, whether scriptural or otherwise. We suggest the reason that people are drawn to variety or opinions, is that one can not hold or believe a wrong opinion. It seems that people desire to be at all times correct regarding opinions; they do not want facts to interfere with their opinions, hence, facts are avoided. Facts are not easily subject to varied understandings and individuals can have incorrect opinions where either facts or reality are considered. Clearly, those who seek the invariable, the eternal, the truth, are one in a thousand or two in ten thousand.
We remain uncertain if the bright morning star will be successful in his attempt of being like the most high. We only know that the Orthodox church teaches being “like”, or similar, to God is the goal of humanity. As far as we know, the Holy Spirit has not revealed to the Church if planets and messengers will partake of theosis and we will successfully resist the urge to idly speculate.

Certain commentators hold to the false belief that scripture is the source of Christianity.  Unlike the Moderns, we are not concerned with intentions, whether good or otherwise, only in the results.  If this belief that the authority of scripture supersedes the authority of the Orthodox Church were correct, then Christianity could not exist before the Age of Printing. Since Orthodox Christianity did exist before scripture, as history readily demonstrates, it follows that Orthodox Christianity cannot be based on scripture. We observe that Heterodox Christianity is based on scripture, as forty thousand denominations attest to the appeal of the variable, the temporal, and the false.

The Gentle Researcher will readily understand that false beliefs can only exist when opinions are the standard for both inquiry and discourse. Should truth be the goal, facts must be esteemed and referenced. There is no other method.

Modern scholarship suggests the first Gospel was written within a decade of the crucifixion and the remaining canonical gospels are dated within the following seventy years. The Orthodox Church long held the opinion that Christ was born in the year six thousand of the world, or the year 492 of our calendar. In light of this fact, it is not surprising that the Orthodox church does not have a dogmatic statement on the year of Christ’s birth.  In the year 1516, Erasmus published the “New Teachings”. 

From the preceding suppositions and facts we may conclude that the year of Christ’s birth is unknown, as the range of years extends from the year 4 B.C. to the fifteenth century. We include the late dating of fifteenth century as possibility by referencing both the date of the “New Teachings” and the scholarly consensus of the collation of the New Testament as occurring within a century of Christ’s crucifixion (A.D. 1516-100 years =A.D. 1416, or the 15th century). Should the Gentle Reader prefer the year of 1413 as the time of the crucifixion, he may be pleased to learn that the city fell forty years later, in the year 1453.

Any attempts to determine the year, let alone the day, of the crucifixion is the modern equivalent of the medieval pastime of calculating the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin. In the age of certainty, the fact that we can not determine the year of an event as important as the crucifixion is disconcerting to most people, especially for those individuals with opinions. We caution that the scattering of the names of national and local political leaders can not provide evidence for any specific date or a range of dates in the absence of a chronological system.  The supposition that Christ lived from 4 B.C. to A.D. 30 is based entirely on the chronology of Scaliger and Petavius as formulated and expounded in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.  For this researcher, the opinion of Scaliger is less satisfying than the Orthodox opinion, at the least the Orthodox have a reason for their supposition,  six thousand years of the world corresponds to the six days of creation. 

As there is no primary evidence that a person known as the Anointed Savior lived,  we are certain that we know nothing concerning the life of Christ, and we make no claims to knowledge we do not possess.  As Occult Researchers cum Philologists, we are conservative and, therefore, we can only claim a belief in Christ and his work and, so there is no potential for an honest misunderstanding, we expressly state our belief that Christ did live, that is, he existed. Unfortunately for those individuals enamored of certainty, we can not claim to know what Christ either did or accomplished, if anything. We only know what is found in scripture and what the Church teaches concerning the life of Christ, for to claim knowledge that is not available to us may lead the Gentle Reader to reasonably conclude we are privileged with the rare gift of supernatural revelations. So there is no potential for an honest misunderstanding, we expressly state we have had no supernatural revelations concerning Christ.

In conclusion to this part, we have no knowledge regarding Christ nor have we experienced a supernatural revelation concerning Christ. Therefore, we are truly ignorant during a epoch that values certainty. Yet, our ignorance is not a hindrance to believing what the Church teaches regarding Christ and his mission. 
There are many opinions explaining not only the meaning, but the purpose of the Incarnation. We are rightly suspicious of claims that appear from nowhere, without a historical precedent. 

The Orthodox Church teaches that man can become divine and, in technical language, the word for this transformation is “theosis”.  The concept is that certain energies of God are dedicated to transforming people into divinities.  The Orthodox church is clear that God's essence is not our essence and we will not partake of God's essence, yet we will changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, into our full potential.  The teaching of the Orthodox Church always makes a distinction between God's essence and God's energies. The Gentle Reader may recall that in the writings attributed to the Church Fathers there are manifold references to essenses, both divine and mundane, but no indication of divine energies. When we consider the totality of the works assigned to the Church Fathers, we rightly ask: “What is the omission of such a vital topic, but the subtle denial of it?” The Gentle Reader may not be concerned with the euphemistic names of prostitutes in Rome, however, this subject is explored under the name of Saint Augustine. 

As Hardouin observed, the writings of the Church Fathers, when correctly understood, are monuments to atheism. This atheism is not explicit, for it would be condemned, it is subtle atheism, so it is unrecognised, and these works are subsequently promoted as though the authors had the mind of Christ.  Although the Orthodox Church quotes from the Church Fathers, it gives the proper sense and meaning to those passages, that is, the Orthodox Church does not rely upon one Church Father to explain a passage in the work of another Church Father, nor does it accept every work assigned to the Church Fathers as inspired. The Orthodox Church interprets the Church Fathers and teaches by its authority.

Just as the Orthodox Church preceded scripture and is not founded upon scripture, so the Orthodox Church preceded the Church Fathers; the Orthodox Church is not based or founded upon the writings of the Church Fathers, so called.

Saint Paul expressly writes that faith is the belief in things not seen. As the Bible is visible and consequently known, is the  modern profession of faith in the Bible a subtle denial of Saint Paul?

We are a spectacle to men and angels, as we are uncertain when Christ lived, what he accomplished, the year of the Crucifixion, the claim of one inerrant version of scripture, our final destiny beyond this world, the arguments for an immortal soul, and likelihood of supernatural revelations. While uncertainties abound, we remain confident in the possibility of theosis, as far as our reason, humanly speaking, is able to understand it. Therefore, although we may be miserable men, we are not the most miserable of men, for we are not without faith; the belief in things not seen.

Perhaps our time in the wonderful world of Occult Research has prepared us to accept that some inquiries result in terrible answers, thereby allowing us to appreciate that, in some instances, research should properly be considered as the initial effort and what follows is not always the end, the answer, but a beginning.

​Finally, on that great and dreadful day, should I be confronted with that terrible question, either singularly or, ironically, by a chorus of Apprentices, of “Did you always know?”,  I can only respond:
​
“Oh, no.  

​No, I didn't.


But, I believed.
​

I believed.”
​
​“Assistant to Apprentice Denver Joe” is the penultimate occasion for Yours Truly to write this awkwardly worded title and the Gentle Reader may justly assume that its source is none other than Joe. Around the time of the creation of Apprentice Denver, Joe had no desire to study under a Master of the Occult Arts and Sciences, but wanted to be Apprentice Denver’s assistant. In the entire written history of the Occult, there was no precedent for such a position as an assistant, so Yours Truly denied Joe's request. 

However, Joe being Joe, and in the fullness of time, Yours Truly acquiesced and created this position and, not willing to be overshadowed by a youth, subsequently created a position inferior to it: “Associate Assistant to Apprentice Denver Joe Isaac (Newton)”. 

Therefore, without further reminisces-

​

By the plenitude of power authorized and granted by the Ancient and Esteemed Order of Hierophants, it is duly proclaimed, declared, and exclaimed that Assistant to Apprentice Denver Joe is hereby elevated to the exalted and sublime position of Apprentice and shall henceforth be recognized as Apprentice Joe to a Master of the Occult Arts and Sciences. 

All rights, privileges, and benefits associated with said position, current and future, are hereby solemnly bestowed and conferred upon Apprentice Joe this first day of May in the year of our Lord and Master two thousand seventeen.

So mote it be.

G.D.O’Bradovich III
​


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.