Stranger Care Examined
or
Wasted Lives
July 4, 2016
G.D.O'Bradovich III
1
Perhaps the most surprising fact from our examination of foster care was that the stress level of the foster care cohort is twice the rate of war veterans. For this essay, we will omit suicide rates, the inability to graduate from high school and college, and rates of depression. We submit that the high levels of stress is the reason for suicide, the failure to graduate, and for depression. In conclusion to this part, stranger care and stress care are synonymous for the observable syndrome of foster care.
As Capricorns detest waste, we can not but realize the wasted ability of hundreds of thousands of individuals over the last half century. The wastefulness, no doubt, continues to the next generation; since continuously "stressed out" individuals can not make "good" parents. We suspect that the issues of stranger care will be observable in the grandchildren of the victims of stranger care, with high rates of government assistance, as our objective standard of analysis, and high rates of poverty.
The high rates of dismal failure of stranger care is so persuasive that any competent accountant would suggest "writing off" the whole activity of foster care as unsustainable. "Deplorable" is reserved for the moralists among us.
We hear voices from darkened corners that those individuals are responsible for their lives and the resultant successes and failures. Yet, as we have noted, foster care is almost synonymous with consistent failure to meet the lowest standard of a first world country, that is, high school graduation. Clearly, if these individuals can not meet a low level of achievement, such as graduating high school, then we cannot expect much in the way of achievement from these afflicted individuals. Because of the overwhelming rated of failure, we are reluctant and cautious in assigning their shortcomings to their responsibility or to their accountability.
We suggest that the perceptual stress associated with stranger care can be seen in the high rates of various "poor" choices- drug use, alcohol abuse, violence, theft, unemployment, and homelessness. Based on the results of stranger care, we are justified in suggesting that its purpose is to transform a first world country into a third world country. This suggestion has the assumption that stranger care has a purpose or goal other than the destruction of productive lives. If this assumption is false, then foster care can only be described as bad, while those who perpetrated stranger care are best described as "unaware" and the worst description of foster care is "evil", whether banal or not.
Elsewhere, we have suggested that child abuse is attributable to the husband of the child's mother, it is not inflicted by the father of the child. If our suggestion is demonstrable, then how much more violence, physical and mental, would be found in households where neither of the adults are related to the child is left to the Gentle Reader to ponder.
Modernity suggests the equality of people. From this premise, it follows that since some adults are good parents, all adults have the equal potential of being good caregivers. Human experience and astrology can not confirm the equality of individuals and, now, we have considerable additional data covering decades of victims sacrificed on the altar of the modern experiment that is foster care. We suggest that stranger care is the foreshadowing of the inevitable result of the ill conceived, long hoped for, but impossible idea, that is human equality.
The Gentle Researcher will note well the similarities between the absurdity of modernism and the asinine nature of foster care.
As Capricorns detest waste, we can not but realize the wasted ability of hundreds of thousands of individuals over the last half century. The wastefulness, no doubt, continues to the next generation; since continuously "stressed out" individuals can not make "good" parents. We suspect that the issues of stranger care will be observable in the grandchildren of the victims of stranger care, with high rates of government assistance, as our objective standard of analysis, and high rates of poverty.
The high rates of dismal failure of stranger care is so persuasive that any competent accountant would suggest "writing off" the whole activity of foster care as unsustainable. "Deplorable" is reserved for the moralists among us.
We hear voices from darkened corners that those individuals are responsible for their lives and the resultant successes and failures. Yet, as we have noted, foster care is almost synonymous with consistent failure to meet the lowest standard of a first world country, that is, high school graduation. Clearly, if these individuals can not meet a low level of achievement, such as graduating high school, then we cannot expect much in the way of achievement from these afflicted individuals. Because of the overwhelming rated of failure, we are reluctant and cautious in assigning their shortcomings to their responsibility or to their accountability.
We suggest that the perceptual stress associated with stranger care can be seen in the high rates of various "poor" choices- drug use, alcohol abuse, violence, theft, unemployment, and homelessness. Based on the results of stranger care, we are justified in suggesting that its purpose is to transform a first world country into a third world country. This suggestion has the assumption that stranger care has a purpose or goal other than the destruction of productive lives. If this assumption is false, then foster care can only be described as bad, while those who perpetrated stranger care are best described as "unaware" and the worst description of foster care is "evil", whether banal or not.
Elsewhere, we have suggested that child abuse is attributable to the husband of the child's mother, it is not inflicted by the father of the child. If our suggestion is demonstrable, then how much more violence, physical and mental, would be found in households where neither of the adults are related to the child is left to the Gentle Reader to ponder.
Modernity suggests the equality of people. From this premise, it follows that since some adults are good parents, all adults have the equal potential of being good caregivers. Human experience and astrology can not confirm the equality of individuals and, now, we have considerable additional data covering decades of victims sacrificed on the altar of the modern experiment that is foster care. We suggest that stranger care is the foreshadowing of the inevitable result of the ill conceived, long hoped for, but impossible idea, that is human equality.
The Gentle Researcher will note well the similarities between the absurdity of modernism and the asinine nature of foster care.